Collaboration in E-Discovery
Anyone who has been involved in the e-discovery process for a case understands that it can be complicated, time-consuming and require the involvement of several people from cross-functional teams. Any lack of collaboration between the different teams can lead to severe consequences, such as additional time and cost, duplication of efforts and potentially not communicating critical observations.
Even just a few years ago, most documents existed in the form of paper and the discovery process would involve going through that paper, along with the supplement request to review the available electronic data. As the world has evolved, more and more documents are stored electronically and discovery now typically starts by looking at the electronically stored information.
Collaboration plays an important role in the e-discovery process. Once the source of information has been identified, the next steps involve collecting the findings and making them presentable, easy to understand, and specific to the task. This requires constant review, processing and analysis and is also the most expensive stage of the e-discovery workflow. Depending on the source of information, the cost of the review process can be up to 80% of the total cost of e-discovery.
There are several emerging technologies that can help limit these costs and streamline the review stage:
1. Full-text extensive search.
In a full-text search, the search engine examines all of the words in every stored document as it tries to match search criteria or words supplied by a user. Full-text guided
navigational search allows users to actively browse/filter the search collection by metadata and categories that have been extracted from the index. Keyword hits can then be passed to a document viewer client, enabling the team
to quickly identify the context of the match, further increasing the efficiency of the file inclusion and exclusion process.
2. Document viewing with remote accessibility.
A unified document viewer can simplify the e-discovery review process, allowing users to view documents directly in the browser without the need to install any additional software or ActiveX controls on the client machine. A typical legal case may involve several different types of documents to be reviewed during the examination process, which would require the use of multiple viewers for different file formats. One cost-effective strategy for corporations with an enterprise content management system is to select a multi-tasking viewer that can be used as a daily document access tool for staff. The same viewer can then be used as a native viewer during e-discovery efforts. A thin-client viewer allows remote, mobile access by anyone participating in the project, such as remote legal aids.
3. Annotations, mark-ups and redactions.
Annotations are crucial to the e-discovery process. A typical viewer should enable annotations such as highlighting, color coding and text notes to be created and displayed with documents stored not only in TIFF, JPEG, or PDF formats, but in native formats as well, such as MS Office or email files. An original version of the document is preserved, while annotated versions can be updated and shared throughout the e-discovery process. A redaction module allows redactions to be "burned in" to documents, effectively removing the underlying confidential text and producing an otherwise indexed and searchable PDF document. An intuitive visual interface allows a user to select text or define a region of a document to be permanently redacted from the document. A strong annotation system can be used in an automated manner to redact regions of content based on location, search results or other rules. Redacted documents can then be published to PDF, TIFF or other image formats and shared with other users. Knowing that sensitive or confidential information has been permanently stripped away from your documents, you can feel safer in sharing your content with legal services or opposing legal teams. Underlying text is not only hidden, but completely removed so that it's not returned in search results, and can't be highlighted or copied. Integrating redaction into your workflow in combination with digital rights management reduces the risk of oversight or error, while locking redacted documents to read-only status for users.
4. Digital rights management.
Digital rights management enables document permissions to be assigned at the user level. Integrating this procedure within the viewing engine simplifies the process of allowing and disallowing printing, saving, annotation and redaction based on each user's needs, without modifying the original legal version of the document. By adding a digital rights management control on the document, you can render the document as read-only and control printing, navigation, pan control and saving within a work group, across departments, or with partners and suppliers outside the firewall.
The review process depends on the review workflow and protocol set up by counsel. However, the use of these emerging technologies can aid the modern electronic litigation process, save money and help enable online analytics, processing and accelerate collaboration on the data.
Accusoft provides a full spectrum of document, content and imaging solutions. With its broad range of solutions, Accusoft is committed to deliver best-in-class, enterprise grade and fully supported applications and a globally recognized suite of software development kits (SDKs). Accusoft products work reliably behind the scenes for capturing, processing, storing and viewing images, documents and more. Add barcode, compression, DICOM, image processing, OCR/ICR, forms processing, PDF, scanning, video, and image viewing to your applications. Products are delivered as applications and toolkits for multiple 32-bit/64-bit platforms and development environments, including iOS, Android, .NET, Silverlight, ASP.NET, ActiveX, Java, Linux, Solaris, Mac OSX, and IBM AIX. For more information, visit www.accusoft.com
Companies and Suppliers Mentioned