KMWorld 2024 Is Nov. 18-21 in Washington, DC. Register now for Super Early Bird Savings!

How to integrate ECM with ERP

Phase 3: Enhance the implementation with more complex recognition, automation, workflows, records management and tuning. In this phase:

  • Expand the use of recognition technology and document automation to more challenging document classes.
  • Implement more complex workflows in ERP and the ECM system.
  • Implement full records management.
  • Use the reporting and analysis capabilities to tune the system and processes.
  • This enhancement may focus on a smaller subset of the users implemented in Phase 2 (in which case Phase 3 should be followed by a Phase 4 which, like Phase 2, rolls out the new capabilities to most or possibly all users). Alternatively, the new capabilities could be introduced to all users addressed in Phase 2, where appropriate.

Using the ECM-ERP AP reference model

The reference model on page 17, KMWorld April 2014, Vol. 23, Issue 4 or Download Chart 2 is specifically for AP but it can apply to many similar processes. It breaks the process down into nine different activities, requiring different ECM capabilities. The different colors (green, red, yellow, blue) show which types of ECM systems are best suited for each of the nine different activities:

  • Granted, blue isn't a type of ECM system but rather the ERP system itself—such as SAP; PeopleSoft, Oracle and JD Edwards (now all oracle.com); Microsoft Dynamics, etc. 
  • Green stands for the activities that are the core strengths of capture-centric solutions—such as ABBYY, Hyland/AnyDoc, EMC/Captiva, IBM/Datacap, Kofax, Parascript, ReadSoft, etc.
  • Purple stands for the activities that are the core strengths of ECM-centric solutions—such as EMC Documentum, IBM FileNet, Hyland, Metafile, OpenText, Microsoft SharePoint, etc.
  • Yellow stands for the activities that are adequately provided by advanced solutions in both the capture-centric and ECM-centric categories.

The purpose of a reference model is to help explain a complex situation-like how a complex business process (AP) can be decomposed into different activities, which in turn can be made more efficient by applying different ECM capabilities, which in turn can be addressed by the products of different vendors.

But it can also be used to explain the strengths and weaknesses of all the capture and ECM vendors mentioned above. And you can use it when you're figuring out your own ECM-enabled ERP strategy. Here are some simple examples:

  • If your primary requirement is advanced ERP integration, then you can pursue either a capture-centric or ECM-centric approach. Why? Because ERP integration is yellow.
  • If your primary requirement is advanced capture (with advanced document and character recognition for the invoices), then you should go with a capture-centric approach or supplement your ECM system with a third-party capture partner-unless your ECM vendor has acquired an advanced capture vendor. Why? Because the two capture activities are green.
  • If your primary requirement is just to digitize the invoices and other documents, without fancy OCR or IDR, and get them into a managed repository that staff can access from the ERP user interface, then you can go with an ECM-centric approach. Why? Because the repository-related activities are purple.

KMWorld Covers
for qualified subscribers
Subscribe Now Current Issue Past Issues