-->

KMWorld 2024 Is Nov. 18-21 in Washington, DC. Register now for Super Early Bird Savings!

ECM is Not Doomed to Fail

It may be bruised and bloodied from a decade of mismanagement, misuse, and misunderstandings…but redemption is at hand!

Has any enterprise solution ever been as maligned as much and as often as ECM has been over the past few years? Disproportionately high numbers of failed initiatives, endless issues with user adoption, persistent reports of its imminent demise as a business priority… How did the stark reality of ECM’s performance end up crash landing so far from its original promise for many organizations? And, more importantly, what are the strategies and tactics that will allow ECM to finally achieve its potential as the centerpiece of information governance and a principal driver of business value?

As we all know, ECM as a concept was originally heralded as an enterprise-wide solution that would provide organizations with the desired “single source of truth.” It was generally implemented as a standalone repository for content, where defensible governance and security policies could finally be applied to large segments of the ever-increasing volumes of unstructured information flowing through organizations. It’s over-simplifying a bit, but it was often viewed as a magic elixir that would single-handedly eliminate the majority of legal and compliance issues facing organizations. Executives, legal teams and records managers could finally sleep at night.

Problem was, its planning and implementation were often a one-sided conversation, driven by business owners with bottom-line concerns of governance, security and compliance. They spent inordinate amounts of time creating massive folder structures and defining complex classification rules to accomplish their goals. No one ever asked the actual future users of the system what they wanted or needed, not only in terms of interacting with this new application, but also how it could potentially make their jobs more efficient and productive.

What We Have Here is Failure to Communicate

Because of this, many ECM implementations made for an epic battle of wills. On one side were administrators focused on enterprise taxonomy structures, rigid application of metadata, fixed permission configurations, and the demand for mass adoption. On the other side was a rank-and-file influenced by the growing consumerization of technology interaction, fixated on doing their job quickly and effectively, and now confronted by another intractable internal system presenting a new set of procedures, requirements, and barriers. Information they (erroneously) considered “theirs” would now be even more inaccessible…and they had to do more work to support this!

It should come as no surprise that the folks in the trenches generally get their way—or some semblance of it—in these confrontations. You just can’t monitor everyone, all the time. Utilizing true (albeit somewhat misplaced) entrepreneurial spirit, individuals, teams, and even entire departments embarked on work-arounds, evasive maneuvers and avoidance techniques to circumvent these new policies and procedures: isolated storage servers popped up overnight, idiosyncratic naming conventions were surreptitiously developed, and information was squirrelled away on flash drives, laptops, and, most chillingly, public file storage applications beyond the control of the corporate firewall.

For many organizations, it resulted in ineffective and incomplete ECM implementations that left a bad taste in everyone’s mouth. No one came out ahead. Executives and senior stakeholders spent a lot of money without realizing their single-source-of-truth master plan, legal and records management still couldn’t trust they were seeing the whole picture and a significant percentage of end users did everything they could to avoid adhering to metadata and file structures, then complained they couldn’t find anything.

Where did it fall apart? As Thomas Edison once said, “The value of an idea lies in the using of it.” In other words, it wasn’t the idea of gathering and governing all your information together in one place that was misplaced, it was what could and should be done with it that was short-sighted. Past generations of ECM implementations failed because they were based on the idea of an ECM solution being a destination, not part of a process; the star of the show, not a facilitator supporting greater endeavors.

Times have changed, and, to paraphrase another great mind, reports of ECM’s death have been greatly exaggerated.

In fact, its future as a core enterprise application has never looked brighter. Advances

in technology—from easier cross-system integration to automation of governance practices to friendlier user interfaces—are eliciting intriguing new ways of thinking about the potential of ECM. Organizations and vendors are now recognizing that ECM shouldn’t be regarded as a siloed final resting place, but rather an integral element driving a holistic approach to enterprise information management (EIM).

They’re realizing that all the information they’ve corralled in their ECM systems can not only provide legal and regulatory solace, it also contains a huge amount of the intrinsic value of an enterprise. It is, indeed, a single source of truth… for all the documented genius, invention and teamwork within an enterprise. Now, imagine if all that intelligence could be effortlessly integrated with and consumed by other systems and knowledge workers? The end result would be far greater than the sum of the parts. It would lead to increased productivity, greater collaboration, improved agility and innovation across the board.

Think Bigger, Reach Farther

Make sense so far? To help envision this new approach, it may help to think of an organization as a living organism. All the various enterprise systems—ERP, CRM, ECM, SCM, HCM and more—comprise the myriad systems that keep that entity functioning and progressing. In human terms, they equate to our respiratory, circulatory, nervous, sensory and other systems. Growth, not to mention survival, is dependent on these systems not only operating efficiently but also interacting effectively; not only maintaining themselves, but also collectively working together to contribute to the development and well-being of the host.

This interaction is the over-riding methodology driving this new way of thinking about ECM and its role within the enterprise. Sure, it’ll always have its established role as the repository and archive of information, but let’s take it farther:

Let’s take its proven capabilities in managing information governance and flow and fully embed them into the complementary systems where business processes actually live.

That’s where the real, relevant action is; where end users operate every day, where information is acquired and accessed to get work done, where the true value of the information we create can be realized.

Putting Content in Context

By addressing “content in context,” the possibilities for improving both top and bottom-line goals are almost limitless. Embedding ECM within and across an enterprise’s systems supports and improves performance across the board. It ties processes and applications together—removing silos, screen flips and uninformed decisions. Governance policies and practices are taken to the information in situ instead of the information having to come to them. User adoption is a non-issue, knowledge workers continue to work in the applications they always have, but now ECM works in the background, providing far greater access to relevant information drawn from other lead applications.

A significant driver behind this newly expanded role for ECM is the ever-increasing regulatory and legal demands for organizations to capture and govern the huge volume of collaborative content we create every day. Fortunately, the leading vendors of ECM applications have made huge strides in using intelligence and business learning models to automate the definition and implementation of consistent metadata, taxonomy and classification standards. Bless ‘em all, but it’s been proven time and time again that end users—being human, after all—just can’t be trusted to reliably execute enterprise governance practices that may appear subjective and possibly even optional; some resent the additional responsibility, some interpret the intent differently, some are sure their rules are better.

KMWorld Covers
Free
for qualified subscribers
Subscribe Now Current Issue Past Issues